Universita' degli studi di Udine - sistema bibliotecario d'Ateneo
Institution name:
- Universita' degli studi di Udine, Sistema Bibliotecario
d'Ateneo (University of Udine, Library System)
- CEDA - Via Palladio 8, Palazzo Florio, 33100 Udine, Italy
Library contact person:
- dr. Liliana Bernardis, Librarian responsible for the
management of the ALEPH system
- tel +39 432 556241; fax +39 432 556309
- e-mail Liliana.Bernardis@bib.uniud.it
Automation contact person:
- Mr. Antonio Cunei, System manager for the University
Library System
- tel +39 432 556236; fax +39 432 556309
- e-mail Antonio.Cunei@amm.uniud.it
Aleph configuration:
- version 3.2_4 (Sept 1994)
- License 40 users, 90.000 records
- Operating system VMS 5.5_2
- Server MicroVAX 3300, (52 MB RAM, 2,2 GB HD, cartridge tape
unit for TK 70)
- Workstations Digital terminals VT 320 and 420 (using LAT
protocol), or Macintosh and PCs (using TCP/IP or DECNET)
- Network configuration includes Ethernet, LocalTalk and
TokenRing technologies
Functions implemented:
- OPAC:
- The search is available in Italian language and in English
language
- Acquisitions:
- Orders (Monographs, Standing Orders, Subscriptions)
- Copies creations (H)
- Vendors update
- Invoice functions
- Budget functions
- Print online claims
- IUTIL 8.1, 8.4, 8.6, 8.12, 8.16
- Cataloging:
- Creation new records via VMS Full Screen Edit Form
- Duplicationrecords from other bases
- Update records
- Save records
- Print saved records
- Deletion records
- Holding management:
- In the ADC command all fields are used; in the alternate
number field bar-codes are entered by barcode readers. Since it
refers to single sub libraries the inventory number is inserted
manually
- Maintenance:
- Authority control procedures (creation new headings,
correction, deletion headings, creation references)
- IUTIL 4.1, 4.4, 4.5, 4.8
- Serials:
- Subscription record
- Open/Update issue parameters record
- Open/Update issue record
- Routing lists
- IUTIL 6.4
- Circulation:
- At present, this function is implemented only by an
Interdepartemental Library Centre
- Borrowers registration and update
- Loan and return transactions
- Update due dates
- IUTIL 5.9, 5.14
- Among the libraries of ITALE the procedures for ILL have been
activated using the CI function. Every base (UDN, SBS, PIS,
ecc.) created, in its own borrower file, a borrower for each of
the other bases in order that every library can request a display
of the list of all its loans and holds. The loan requests are
sent by e-mail.
- Retrieval and print IUTIL: IUTIL 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 3.1, 3.3,
3.4, 3.8, 3.9.
- Developments in progress:
- Down load of data from the University registry archives into
Borrowers file
- Use of Circulation by the all Library System Centres
- Database management:
- Weekly ALEPH backup
- Monthly System backup
- UTIL 23, 30, 64
Major developments since last ICAU meeting:
During the last year our University System was reorganized and
new library services were created: Departmental and
Interdepartmental Library Centres, the first to manage the
bibliographic material of a single Department, the latter derived
from the merging of the libraries of already existing or newly
founded Departments.The birth of these new centres, in place of
the (23) previous Institute/Departmental libraries, called for
a segmentation of our database in sublibraries: sometimes two of
the former sublibraries became one centre, responsible for the
whole process of the management and acquisition of bibliographic
material, in other cases the entities responsible for expenses
increased. In fact, even though bibliographic material was
combined in a single centre to be managed according to similar
criteria, Departments still are autonomous financially as regards
acquisition, inventory and payment of their books. In short, our
Library System is now made of 3 Interdepartmental Library Centres
(one of them is the result of the unification of ten of the
former Institute/Departmental libraries) and some other
Departmental Library Centres which, of course, are of reduced
dimension; finally there is a University Library Centre for the
coordination of the System and for professional training.
This situation obviously encouraged the process of
standardization of library procedures and simplified the central
catalogue management, but, as regards administrative-accounting
aspects, it required a very complex and difficult configuration.
In fact, the number of sublibraries needed to support this new
structure is about forty, with different vendors, budgets,
acquisition procedures and inventories. In spite of the
inconveniences caused by this reorganisation, since October 1994
all of the centres adopted the Acquisition module which was not
currently used by everybody.
The database now consits of about 63.000 records and the remote
user can reach it by the following methods:
- telnet:
aleph.bib.uniud.it username: ALEPH, no password
- gopher://gopher.uniud.it
The planned enlargement of the University Library System to
support other town libraries is proceeding very slowly: at the
moment the most important town cultural service (The Municipal
Library) still remains just a point of search (the University
installed some terminals there to allow users to access the ALEPH
System) and continues using a different information support base
for its bibliographic material. Meanwhile, the Library of CISM
(International Centre for Mechanical Sciences) sanctioned its
adhesion to the University Library System.
Major developments planned
Antonio Cunei
Lately the MicroVax performance was unacceptable; therefore
following Ex-Libris' directions, we recently purchased a Sun
SPARCserver 1000E to move our existing VAX-based Aleph archive
to UNIX. The UNIX release of Aleph has been ordered, and we're
currently waiting for the media. The installation, which will be
performed by Atlantis, is planned for the beginning of September.
In the mean time, we are configuring the new machine, and
checking its capabilities. As said, it's a Sun SPARCserver 1000E,
dual processor, 192MB RAM and 4 SCSI, 1 GB hard drives. Included
are also a DAT unit (actually DDS) which should allow 5GB to be
packed on a single 90m cassette, and a CD-ROM unit.
Included as well are several CD-ROMs containing Solaris 2.4 and
the on-line manuals, demos of various products, and a really
interesting tool named "Online: DiskSuite 3.0". It allows
advanced disk managing options, as disk mirroring (duplications
of data, to prevent service interruption even in case of HD
hardware failure), striping, logging and, which is more
attractive, the ability of performing on-line backups. The
temporary configuration we made on the disks is: root, /usr,
aleph data, aleph docu, and aleph binaries partitions (everything
duplicated), plus a scratch area. We tried to optimize write
load for each drive as well as minimize heads movements.
Unfortunately we are not currently able to evaluate possible
performance improvements or degrade using this kind of
configuration. What is sure is that we are now able to perform
a total on-line backup bringing down the system for as little as
a few minutes.
From the software viewpoint, we installed on the machine, waiting
for Aleph, the "bash" shell, Elm, Emacs, gcc, gzip/gunzip, less,
and sendmail 8.6.12 (much needed, since we don't plan to use
neither NIS nor NIS+, and the m4 configuration macros are not
included in Sun's distribution). Next in our to-list is Lynx, and
several other minor system enhancement.
In two months we hope to start a project for the card catalogues
conversion by typing in ALEPH at least some data of the card
catalogue. The project will be accomplished also by external
staff.
Open problems
A few weeks before the arrival of a new server with a UNIX
system, while this report was being compiled, we received news
(an e-mail message sent by Barbara Rad-el, transmitted by a
colleague to other Italian users) of the release of a Open VMS
version. We cannot conceal our disappointement
- as for how we
learned of this (why were not all the users formally advised?)
- for the contradictions and changes in a commercial policy
which might act as a heavy discriminatory factor.
Our University
was ready and willing to provide for the higher costs and
troubles of a conversion which was formally favoured during the
last Meeting, and now we find out that we could have easily
remained the way we were without all the cost!
Back to Update
Reports
Back to ICAU '95 main
menu